CONTENTS

7> | Editorial

ARTICLES

9> | How to Solve Paradoxes: A Taxonomy and Analysis of Solution-Types
Como resolver paradojas: Una taxonomía y el análisis de soluciones tipo
MARGARET A. CUONZO, Long Island University

23> | The fallacies of Composition and Division Revisited
Las falacias de composición y división revisitadas
FRANS H. VAN EEMEREN AND BART GARSSEN, University of Amsterdam

43> | Logical Opposition and Social Opposition
Oposición lógica y oposición social
TRUDY GOVIER, University of Lethbridge

59> | On the Alleged Failure of Informal Logic
Sobre el pretendido fallo de la lógica informal
RALPH H. JOHNSON, University of Windsor

89> | Constructive Controversy: Rhetoric as Dissensus-oriented Discourse
Controversia constructiva: La retorica como discurso de disenso orientado
CHRISTIAN KOCK, University of Copenhagen

113> | Discurso escolar y argumentación. Acerca de algunas estrategias en la construcción del ethos disciplinar de Ciencias Sociales
Educational Discourse and Argumentation. Strategies in the Construction of Disciplinary ethos in the Social Sciences
CAROLINA TOSI, Universidad de Buenos Aires

BOOK REVIEWS

139> | Review of Douglas Walton, Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach (2nd ed.).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008
STEVEN W. PATTERSON, Marygrove College

149> | Treating Kuhn's Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009
FRANK ZENKER, University of Lund